Title: The Reverse Collision
2012
JvK
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: At this point, many scientists
believe that the best theory to describe the Big Bang is a String theory. In
this article I present another possibility for how the Big Bang could have occurred: The Reverse
Collision, which could have happened in two steps. These steps are explained on this website.
Summary: A theory of how the Big Bang could have occurred is presented in this article: The Reverse Collision.
The heart of the theory is this: the force between two particles is inversely propotional to the distance between them. As the distance between basic particles becomes increasingly small the force becomes increasingly large and will tend to approach infinity.
Introduction
At this point, some scientists believe in a so called String theory. But there is a big problem with that theory. This theory causes more questions, like for example: “Where did these strings come from?” I formed another plausible theory of how The Big Bang could have happened. My theory is explained in this document. The inspiration for my theory came from the BBC FOUR documentary: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) (Supplementary Materials 1 on the bottom of this site). In this documentary, scientists explain that if two basic, extremely small point-like particles come infinitely close together, the gravitational force between them can become practically infinite. Two steps involving three of the smallest particles in the universe could explain how the big Bang occurred. This theory is extremely simple. This theory does, contrary to a string-theory, not raise any other questions, but it could answer a lot of them. Like the question of what was there before The Big Bang.
How it could have happened, two steps leading to The Big Bang
STEP 1: TWO ROTATING PARTICLES
Summary: A theory of how the Big Bang could have occurred is presented in this article: The Reverse Collision.
The heart of the theory is this: the force between two particles is inversely propotional to the distance between them. As the distance between basic particles becomes increasingly small the force becomes increasingly large and will tend to approach infinity.
Introduction
At this point, some scientists believe in a so called String theory. But there is a big problem with that theory. This theory causes more questions, like for example: “Where did these strings come from?” I formed another plausible theory of how The Big Bang could have happened. My theory is explained in this document. The inspiration for my theory came from the BBC FOUR documentary: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) (Supplementary Materials 1 on the bottom of this site). In this documentary, scientists explain that if two basic, extremely small point-like particles come infinitely close together, the gravitational force between them can become practically infinite. Two steps involving three of the smallest particles in the universe could explain how the big Bang occurred. This theory is extremely simple. This theory does, contrary to a string-theory, not raise any other questions, but it could answer a lot of them. Like the question of what was there before The Big Bang.
How it could have happened, two steps leading to The Big Bang
STEP 1: TWO ROTATING PARTICLES
Fig. 1. Step one of how The Big Bang could be explained: The result of the Nearest Miss between two of the smallest particles.
Figure 1 shows the first step that could have lead to The Big Bang: Two of the smallest particles in the universe are rotating at practically infinite rotational speed. The two particles entered each other’s gravitational field but did just not collide; they practically touched each other, resulting in a stable situation because the practically infinite force is compensated by a practically infinite rotational speed. This was most likely the first step of The Big Bang.
STEP 2: ROTATING PARTICLES ARE HIT BY A THIRD PARTICLE
Figure 1 shows the first step that could have lead to The Big Bang: Two of the smallest particles in the universe are rotating at practically infinite rotational speed. The two particles entered each other’s gravitational field but did just not collide; they practically touched each other, resulting in a stable situation because the practically infinite force is compensated by a practically infinite rotational speed. This was most likely the first step of The Big Bang.
STEP 2: ROTATING PARTICLES ARE HIT BY A THIRD PARTICLE
Fig. 2. Step two of how The Big Bang could be explained: The Reverse Collision
Figure 2 shows the second step that could have lead to The Big Bang: The two smallest particles, rotating at practically infinite speeds are hit by a third smallest particle, straight in the middle. The two rotating particles have a speed V1, the third particle has an opposite speed, V2. This collision could have been step 2 of The Big Bang. The 3rd particle tore the two rotating particles away from each other by this collision. Because of the practically infinite force in combination with a travelled distance, the result could have been a practical infinite amount of energy. Energy is force multiplied by a travelled distance. Since the force could have been practically infinite and a distance could be travelled because of the collision with the 3rd particle, the energy could have been practically infinite as well. This practically infinite amount of energy could have resulted in a practically infinite amount of mass and a practically infinite amount of energy. This has been explained by Einstein by his most commonly known formula E=mc2.
Conclusion
It is my belief that the two steps must have happened in a very short time. It is also my belief that there will never be a collapse of our universe. This would be supported by measurements of scientists, indicating that the expansion of the universe is only accelerating, and not decelerating. A Perfect Reverse Collision will according to my theory only happen once every so many billion years, with just the right circumstances. The smallest basic particles were exerting gravitational forces on each other, which lead to movements. Only when one collision is perfect, a Big Bang will occur.
References and Notes:
1. Figure 1: Step one of how The Big Bang could be explained: The result of the Nearest Miss between two of the smallest particles.
2. Figure 2: Step two of how The Big Bang could be explained: The Reverse Collision.
Supplementary Materials:
1 BBC FOUR documentary: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - The Big Bang Experiment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgWd_O8juoU. Special interest: from 50:48 to 51:26. – Practically infinite gravitational force is explained
2 BBC FOUR documentary: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - The Big Bang Experiment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgWd_O8juoU. Special interest: from 49:05 to 50:48. – An explanation of String theory is given.
You may not copy, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, modify or create derivative works of or in any way exploit or use materials without written permission of the author
Might you be interested in a youtube presentation on this subject, contact me via the contact fields below.
Figure 2 shows the second step that could have lead to The Big Bang: The two smallest particles, rotating at practically infinite speeds are hit by a third smallest particle, straight in the middle. The two rotating particles have a speed V1, the third particle has an opposite speed, V2. This collision could have been step 2 of The Big Bang. The 3rd particle tore the two rotating particles away from each other by this collision. Because of the practically infinite force in combination with a travelled distance, the result could have been a practical infinite amount of energy. Energy is force multiplied by a travelled distance. Since the force could have been practically infinite and a distance could be travelled because of the collision with the 3rd particle, the energy could have been practically infinite as well. This practically infinite amount of energy could have resulted in a practically infinite amount of mass and a practically infinite amount of energy. This has been explained by Einstein by his most commonly known formula E=mc2.
Conclusion
It is my belief that the two steps must have happened in a very short time. It is also my belief that there will never be a collapse of our universe. This would be supported by measurements of scientists, indicating that the expansion of the universe is only accelerating, and not decelerating. A Perfect Reverse Collision will according to my theory only happen once every so many billion years, with just the right circumstances. The smallest basic particles were exerting gravitational forces on each other, which lead to movements. Only when one collision is perfect, a Big Bang will occur.
References and Notes:
1. Figure 1: Step one of how The Big Bang could be explained: The result of the Nearest Miss between two of the smallest particles.
2. Figure 2: Step two of how The Big Bang could be explained: The Reverse Collision.
Supplementary Materials:
1 BBC FOUR documentary: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - The Big Bang Experiment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgWd_O8juoU. Special interest: from 50:48 to 51:26. – Practically infinite gravitational force is explained
2 BBC FOUR documentary: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - The Big Bang Experiment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgWd_O8juoU. Special interest: from 49:05 to 50:48. – An explanation of String theory is given.
You may not copy, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, modify or create derivative works of or in any way exploit or use materials without written permission of the author
Might you be interested in a youtube presentation on this subject, contact me via the contact fields below.
Discussion
On the "Discussion"-tab on this page
Today, tomorrow is yesterday - "Star Trek" Tomorrow Is Yesterday (1967)